Background

Across different ways of thinking and acting.

Engineering, finance, management, education and philosophy belong to the same trajectory: understanding complex problems, forming judgment and deciding when reality offers no complete guarantees.

Engineering Finance Education Philosophy Development
Ricardo Razuk
Ricardo Razuk
Professor, researcher, engineer and academic coordinator.
More than a résumé

A trajectory that does not fit within a single discipline.

My education and professional work cross fields that are often treated separately. Over time, engineering, finance, management, education and philosophy came to function less as compartments and more as different perspectives on similar problems.

Across technical, academic and institutional environments, the same demand reappears: distinguish what can be calculated from what requires judgment; recognize limits without abandoning action; and revise decisions when experience changes the problem.

The thread running through this trajectory is not the accumulation of credentials. It is the attempt to think better when decisions must be made before uncertainty disappears.
Movements across a trajectory

Different fields, questions that meet again.

The movements below are not closed stages. They overlap and continue to interact in my current work.

01

Engineering and problem structuring

Training in Production Engineering at UFRJ established a first discipline of thought: breaking problems down, working with constraints, data, and models, and recognizing that technical decisions also involve choices of criteria.

02

Energy, finance and management

Professional experience, including at Petrobras, brought engineering, energy, large projects, finance and management together in highly complex environments. Study at COPPEAD/UFRJ and the University of Porto deepened this dimension.

03

Education and the formation of judgment

At Fundação Getulio Vargas, academic coordination and teaching in graduate and executive programs made education a permanent field of work: developing the capacity for judgment, not merely transmitting content.

04

Philosophy and research

A master's degree in Philosophy at PUC-Rio and ongoing doctoral research at UFRJ brought skepticism, Montaigne, doubt, inquietude, experience, judgment, and action to the center of the inquiry. Academic periods in Paris and Montpellier broadened that path.

05

Development, climate, and reparation

At BNDES, work on issues related to extreme climate events and the Rio Doce Fund once again brings together analysis, coordination, finance, development and decision-making under uncertainty and long-term impact.

Current work

Two contexts, the same demand for responsibility.

BNDES

Engineering, development, and resilience

Work on issues related to extreme climate events and the Rio Doce Fund, in contexts that connect response, reconstruction, territorial development, support instruments and multiple institutional actors.

Fundação Getulio Vargas

Academic coordination and teaching

Coordination and teaching in executive education programs in finance, investments, sustainability and behavioral economics, bringing theory, professional experience and real decision problems together.

Interdisciplinary education

Three traditions of education.

Interdisciplinarity here is not a label. It results from distinct forms of education that continue to shape how I read problems and build questions.

Engineering & management

Structure, systems and decision

Production Engineering at UFRJ and a master's degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from the University of Porto.

Business & finance

Organizations, capital and development

Master’s degree in Business Administration and specialization in Energy Economics and Management at COPPEAD/UFRJ.

Philosophy

Experience, judgment and action

Master's degree in Philosophy at PUC-Rio and ongoing doctorate in Philosophy at UFRJ, with academic periods at Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne and Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3.

The thread that connects the path

Not eliminating uncertainty, but learning to work with it.

Looking back, what connects these fields is not a single discipline but a set of problems: how to interpret complex situations, how to form judgment, how to decide with incomplete information, and how to remain open to revision without turning doubt into paralysis.

That is the unity that now brings my philosophical research, professional work and education together.

AnalysisStructure problems without confusing model and reality.
JudgmentDecide when criteria, values and consequences come into tension.
ExperienceAllow encounters with reality to revise hypotheses and convictions.
UncertaintyAct without demanding guarantees that the situation cannot provide.
Continue the path

Explore the areas in which this trajectory unfolds today.

Research, education and professional work are different paths of the same concern with judgment, decision and experience.